Gas-filled porosity is generally considered to be full of hydrocarbons when performing core analysis based on observations from testing on conventional rocks. Is this correct to assume in unconventional rocks? Why or why not?
Gas-filled porosity is generally considered to be full of hydrocarbons when performing core analysis based on observations from testing on conventional rocks. Is this correct to assume in unconventional rocks? Why or why not?
Ready to join our block community of business leaders for four days of virtual sessions on driving developer happiness and boosting productivity?
Place Order