EdSIMSReflection-CulturalCompetency.pdf

Page 1 of 2

Simulation Reflection – Cultural Competency

General Instructions

• Access the simulation “Cultural Competency”. • Complete the simulation, taking note of what actions/decisions were successful

and which actions/decisions lead to suggestions or other feedback. Make note that feedback to include/discuss in the attached reflection activity.

• Below is a set of questions that will help you reflect on the experience and think critically about the choices you made during the simulation.

o Briefly describe the situation. o Describe the leadership standards that were involved. Be sure you

discuss how the leadership standards are involved in this specific situation (do not just list them).

o Reflect on your experience: ▪ What decisions did you make that went well? Describe.

▪ What decisions did you make that you would do differently? Why?

o What have you learned from this experience that will impact your future

leadership?

o Share your thoughts on completing the simulation in general.

• Submit your responses to the questions for evaluation.

Scoring Guidelines

Points available: 10.

Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

Description and Standards: A brief description of the

scenario is provided, and appropriate standards are

identified and aligned with the scenario.

No description is shared, and no standards are

identified, or they are not applicable. (0 points)

A brief description of the scenario is shared, but appropriate standards are not identified and

aligned with the scenario. (1 point)

A clear description of the scenario is shared, and appropriate standards

are identified and aligned with the scenario.

(2 points)

Reflection: Positive decisions are identified

and the impact on learning is described.

The reflection is not adequate and does not

describe positive decisions or learning that

occurred. (0 points)

The reflection describes positive decisions but does not include clear

justifications that support the learning are

described. (1 point)

The reflection includes positive decisions made

and clear, well-developed justifications that support the learning

are described. (2 points)

Page 2 of 2

Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target

Reflection: Ineffective decisions are identified

and suggestions for improvements are

outlined.

The reflection is not adequate and does not

describe ineffective decisions or suggestions

for improvement. (0 points)

The reflection describes ineffective decisions but does not include clear

suggestions for improvement. (1 point)

The reflection includes ineffective decisions and

clear, well-developed suggestions for

improvement. (2 points)

Leadership Impacts: Clear connections to

future leadership style and choices are

provided.

No connections between the experience and

future leadership style and choices are

identified. (0 points)

Connections between the experience and

future leadership style and choices are identified, but not justified. (1 point)

Connections between the experience and

future leadership style and choices are identified, and

justifications are thorough and clear.

(2 points)

Professional Presentation:

Reflections are free of grammar, mechanics, and spelling errors.

Writing contains 3 or more errors. (0 points)

Writing contains minimum errors (1-2

errors). (1 point)

Writing is free of errors. (2 points)